340 results for 'cat:"Property" AND cat:"Contract"'.
J. Barrett finds the circuit court improperly found the romantic partner would be unjustly enriched. The homeowner added her partner's name to the deed of the house under the assumption the parties would be married. After the sale of the house, the partner claimed he was allowed to keep half of the net proceeds from the sale as a joint tenant. The owner made a gift to her partner when she placed his name on the deed. Though the owner regrets the decision, this is not a valid basis for setting aside a deed. Reversed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Barrett , Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: CV-23-27, Categories: Civil Procedure, property, contract
J. Borden denies, in part, a sellers’ motion for judgment on the breach of contract pleadings in this real estate purchase dispute against the buyers who counterclaims for breach of contract, misrepresentation and suppression. Both parties agree they entered a valid agreement to sell and purchase the property. The sellers argue the buyers failing to close by the date agreed was a breach the contract. The buyers argue the sellers refusing to terminate the agreement and return their money was breach of contract, misrepresentation and suppression. As for the breach of contract claims, there are questions of fact concerning whether the buyers contacted the sellers to discuss termination. The buyers’ misrepresentation and suppression counterclaims fail as a matter of law; constructive knowledge precludes their claims.
Court: USDC Northern District of Alabama , Judge: Borden, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 6:23cv888, NOS: All Other Real Property - Real Property, Categories: Civil Procedure, property, contract
J. Tunheim partially grants the mobile home park buyer's motion for summary judgment in its suit against the seller. While fact disputes remain as to the terms of the parties' contract, the seller's counterclaims for breach of good faith and fair dealing and breach of contract fail as a matter of law.
Court: USDC Minnesota, Judge: Tunheim, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 0:23cv1559, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: property, contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Penzato finds that the trial court improperly denied a motion to annul an order dismissing a contract dispute involving the sale of a property. The record does not show that the buyer was served notice of the hearing for the motion to dismiss. Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Penzato, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 2023CA0911, Categories: property, contract
J. Arterburn finds the county court properly granted specific performance as to the original property owner's right of first refusal. The original owner sold property to their farming employee, executing a promissory note for payment of $37,000 over eight years. A trust deed provided the purchaser would get the owner's consent if he meant to sell the property before paying it off. A warranty deed also gave the seller right of first refusal. The original owner was not provided with sufficient notice of the sale. Affirmed.
Court: Nebraska Court Of Appeals, Judge: Arterburn , Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: A-23-165, Categories: property, Banking / Lending, contract
J. Riedmann finds the district court properly found for the romantic partner who received funds from her partner to purchase and remodel her home. The lender signed a form stating he did not expect repayment and he voluntarily sent the funds with no discussion of repayment. The doctrine of unjust enrichment does not require a homeowner to repay funds just because the relationship has ended. Affirmed.
Court: Nebraska Court Of Appeals, Judge: Riedmann , Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: A-23-515, Categories: Fraud, property, contract
J. Bishop finds the district court properly divided the marital property in this marriage dissolution. The land on which the marital residence and a barn were built was acquired and paid for by the husband before the marriage. Evidence supports the land is nonmarital, although the parties jointly paid a mortgage on the property. Therefore, the wife is entitled to one-half of that marital equity. Affirmed.
Court: Nebraska Court Of Appeals, Judge: Bishop , Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: A-23-249, Categories: Family Law, property, contract
J. Graham grants, in part, the cell tower operator's motion for summary judgment, ruling the property owner's placement of a padlock on the gate to bar access to the cell tower is undoubtedly a breach of the parties' lease agreement, while the potential loss of cell service or subscribers is sufficient to prove damages. Therefore, the tower operator is entitled to an injunction to require the property owner to remove the padlock and allow unfettered access to the tower.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Graham, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv764, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: property, contract, Injunction
[Consolidated.] J. Atkins finds that the trial court should not have found for a tax sale purchaser of a property on its petition to annul judgment rendered in favor of the original owner's exception of no right of action on the purchaser's petition to confirm title. In this case, the purchaser claimed that the owner clandestinely changed the address of its property after the tax sale purchase and failed to inform the trial court, which constituted fraud or ill practices. A determination of the intent behind the owner's failure to inform the trial court that it changed its property address hinges on questions of credibility and is a question of fact which is inappropriate for summary judgment. Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Atkins, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 2023-CA-0707, Categories: property, contract
J. Chehardy finds that the trial court should not have enforced the husband's motion to enforce the settlement agreement related to the parties' partition of community property. In this case, there is no settlement document outlining the obligations of the parties or their acquiescence to its terms, and the exchange of text messages and emails between counsel did not create an enforceable settlement agreement between the parties. Further, the wife should not have been sanctioned for refusing to sign the settlement agreement. Reversed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Chehardy, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 23-CA-471, Categories: property, Settlements, contract
J. Smith grants a buyer leave to amend breach of contract claims concerning the sale of real property because the buyer sufficiently claimed that the original contract was breached when the U.S. changed the closing date.
Court: Court of Federal Claims, Judge: Smith, Filed On: April 18, 2024, Case #: 23-1182, Categories: property, contract
J. Fitzwater finds that a tobacco store did not breach its lease for advertising CBD and other products because they are legal and commonly found in tobacco stores. But the store did breach its lease for selling bongs and pipes which are specifically prohibited in the terms of the contract. Summary judgment is granted to the tobacco store on the CBD claims, as well as to the property owner on the bong and pipe claims. The court grants the tobacco store leave to file an opposition response to summary judgment granted to the owner.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Fitzwater, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv781, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: property, contract
J. Harrison finds the circuit court properly denied the attorney's claim for legal fees. The attorney sought fees from the estate of his deceased brother's deceased wife for long-term legal work he claims to have provided "on loose payment terms." The deceased brother lost the contract suit he brought against his wife alleging her failure to pay him for property sales. There is substantial evidence the attorney was paid. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Harrison , Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: CV-23-212, Categories: property, Attorney Fees, contract
J. Stroud finds that the trial court improperly ruled for the homeowners' association in this dispute over fines assessed for chickens certain homeowners kept on their lot because the court misinterpreted language in the community covenant to exclude chickens as household pets. Reversed.
Court: North Carolina Court of Appeals, Judge: Stroud, Filed On: April 16, 2024, Case #: COA22-919, Categories: property, contract
J. Fischer finds the district court properly entered the divorce decree. The couple was married in California and after the separation the wife moved to Oklahoma. The divorce proceeded between the states slowly and contentiously. Though the ex-wife has not preserved any of the many issues she puts forth, the court's review for fundamental error finds none. The ex-wife's claim she did not receive proper notice is not supported by the record. Affirmed
Court: Oklahoma Courts Of Appeal, Judge: Fischer , Filed On: April 11, 2024, Case #: 117025, Categories: Family Law, property, contract
J. Gallagher finds that the trial court improperly dismissed this specific performance dispute brought by a lessor trying to purchase the leased property against a property company. The lessor argues the trial court erred based on the doctrine of lis alibi pendens when dismissing the complaint after the property company filed the motion for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. This appeal had reasonable grounds for being filed. Therefore, the assignment of error is sustained, and this case is remanded for further proceedings. The lessor may recover the costs taxed and a special mandate is issued to the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas to execute this judgment. Reversed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Gallagher, Filed On: April 4, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-1284, Categories: property, Jurisdiction, contract
J. Schmehl denies in part a foam insulation company’s motion to dismiss a pipe company’s intellectual property complaint arising from a botched product development agreement and potential acquisition between parties whose relationship eventually soured. The pipe company’s expert report contains potentially problematic accounting practices at the insulation company that create genuine disputes of material fact for trial.
Court: USDC Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Schmehl, Filed On: April 4, 2024, Case #: 5:21cv5077, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: Evidence, property, contract